|
August 2008 Power of the Human
Voice
Chief
Justice John Roberts once joked, when he was younger, that the
Constitution was "safe" for a while because the Supreme Court at that time
had just taken their official recess.
Now
that the current liberal Dem controlled Congress has taken its August
recess, we say, the American people are safe for a while from ineptitude
and the scary possibilities of bad legislation being forced us.
Rush Limbaugh
is primarily a broadcasting icon because he has for twenty years refused
to allow his intelligent, entertaining and influential radio voice to
become marginalized and snuffed out by liberal politicians and the
mainstream media.
We believe the anti-American "Fairness
Doctrine" should remain in the trash heap of misguided ideas where it has
been for decades.
Lately, liberals whose ideas cannot
create any real forward traction with the vast majority of the American
people, have pressured their liberal comrades in Congress to try and reinstate the
"Fairness Doctrine," which would essentially coerce media outlets to
provide "equal" time for liberals.
Liberalism continues to be a proven
failure in the marketplace of ideas.
Rush Limbaugh, as much as any one
individual in the nation, simply with his voice, his intellect and a
microphone, has helped lead the way in bringing liberals down to this pathetic point of
failure, that
is, trying to create government sanctioned control of the airways via laws that are, and would be in reality,
the exact
opposite of what the Fairness Doctrine is deceptively called.
from Congress...
Rep. Greg Walden Rep. Mike
Pence
Even today, Rush, as
he’s known to his listeners, continues to cast the largest shadow over the
talk radio business, and we salute him for his yeoman’s work in
articulating conservative opinion about the world in which we live.
However, the freedom that Rush Limbaugh enjoys on the airwaves of America
is under attack as liberals in Congress step up their efforts to restore
the Fairness Doctrine.
As we have written
before, the Fairness Doctrine is a dated regulation by which the federal
government exerts control over political views expressed on the public
airwaves. It is dangerous to suggest that a government bureaucracy would
be a competent arbiter of free speech, yet under this rule, unelected FCC
officials would have the authority to determine which speech is legal.
The Fairness Doctrine
was created more than half-a-century ago under the notion that it would
encourage policy discussion on the airwaves, but instead it stifled it and
granted government officials in Washington, D.C. unprecedented power to
regulate free speech.
When the Fairness Doctrine took effect in 1949, broadcasters responded by
avoiding controversial issues completely, unwilling to jump through the
logistical hoops and shoulder the financial burden of complying with such
burdensome regulations. Talk radio was bland, monolithic and drew a meager
following. Indeed, this was precisely the opposite of what a healthy
democracy should want or expect from its radio press.
When the Reagan Administration finally repealed the Fairness Doctrine in
the summer of 1987, no one could have predicted what would happen next.
The doors to an unencumbered exchange of ideas on the airwaves of America
were flung wide open. Now, instead of having to heed onerous dictates of a
bureaucracy that could levy stiff fines or revoke a station’s license for
not airing the views regulators determined should be heard, producers of
the talk radio industry needed only to comply with the desires and demands
of the free market — control was wrested from the federal government and
placed squarely in the hands of the American consumer.
As we approach the two-decade mark of Mr. Limbaugh’s dominant run in the
post-Fairness Doctrine radio era, it’s worth noting just how many
lawmakers want to shut down him and his colleagues — on the right and the
left.
To enact a permanent ban on the Fairness Doctrine and to ensure that no
President, present or future, will ever regulate the airwaves of America
without Congressional approval, we introduced H.R. 2905: “The Broadcaster
Freedom Act.” Yet, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would not allow our
legislation to come to the House floor for a vote.
She personally supports
a revival of the Fairness Doctrine.
Among those legislators who have taken to the press, pining for the
reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine are Senate Majority Whip Dick
Durbin, Representative Maurice Hinchey, and Senator John Kerry. On June
26, 2007, Senator Kerry told the Bryan Lehrer Show that “the Fairness
Doctrine ought to be there.” According to Senator Kerry, free speech and
free expression are apparently dangerous, but the reality is that the
liberal Left reserves that designation only for speech with which they
disagree.
Because Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Hoyer and the rest of the Democrat
Leadership refuse to put this critical legislation on the calendar, we
filed a discharge petition – which, if signed by 218 Members of Congress,
would force an up-or-down vote on the Broadcaster Freedom Act.
It has been almost a year since we filed that discharge petition, and to
date, almost every House Republican has signed the petition but not a
single House Democrat has joined us. If 218 Members sign, a vote on this
legislation would be forced, the bill would pass, and it would effectively
stop the movement to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.
What should not be lost amidst this legislative limbo is that the course
that the Democrat Party seems to be charting is the truly dangerous
scenario: government bureaucrats empowered as judge and jury, sequestered
away in some office in Washington, DC, reviewing endless tapes of any and
all opinionated broadcasters such as the iconic Rush Limbaugh and
rendering decisions on what is “legitimate” dialogue on what they deem to
be “controversial” topics.
The scene above may seem like something straight out of 1984, but we are
reminded on the 20th anniversary of the Rush Limbaugh Show that we’re only
two decades removed from such absurdity.
Should the liberals succeed in their effort to re-impose the ‘Fairness
Doctrine’ they will inflict great damage on the First Amendment and send
talk show hosts -- left, right and center -- packing. Freedom of speech is
one of the most cherished pillars of our society and nowhere would its
loss be more keenly felt than on the airwaves.
If the Broadcaster Freedom Act is brought to the floor of the U.S. House
of Representatives, we have every confidence it will pass, because when
freedom gets an up-or-down vote in the People’s House, freedom always
wins.
On the 20-year anniversary of Rush Limbaugh’s radio debut, the best
present we can give him is to spike the Fairness Doctrine once and for
all.
Mr. Walden is a Republican Congressman representing Oregon.
Copyright © 2008 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Excerpts from tributes to Rush
Limbaugh by prominent conservatives
Marji Ross...At
Regnery, we often say that TV watchers like TV, but radio listeners
are the real book buyers. So, for the past 15 years, we have prioritized
talk radio above all other media for our authors.
The debates are more
interesting, the discussion is more meaningful, and the results speak for
themselves. And we know that, if Rush ever talks about one of our books,
we see an immediate spike in demand. His listeners, along with the
listeners to dozens of other great shows, are motivated to learn more
about the world around them, and to take an active role in improving their
lives for themselves and their families.
We also know, here at Regnery, that talk radio
would not be thriving today were it not for Rush Limbaugh. From the
beginning, Rush understood the very same principles we use to turn books
into best-sellers, namely: it’s not enough just to identify your audience,
but the real power of effective communication is when you actually like
your audience. When you care about what they care about, when you care
about what they have to say. That is, in large part, the recipe for our
success. And the master chef is Rush Limbaugh.
Marji Ross is President and
Publisher of Regnery Publishing.
Rush
Limbaugh...Well, I think the bond of loyalty that this audience has
expressed and demonstrated to me has caused me to have a different view of
the audience as a broadcast professional than I ever had as simply a disk
jockey. I didn’t do my first talk show until 1984…Serious talk show
in 1984 in Sacramento. That’s when my success track began and the whole
concept of respecting their intelligence and respecting their loyalty and
considering them a family and treating them that way has, I think, had an
immeasurable impact on the way I approach the program each and every day
and the way I judge each program’s success factor.
Rush Limbaugh
from an interview with Human Events Editor Jed Babbin
Back To Top
Jim Bohannan...Of
course, the hallmark of Rush Limbaugh is controversy, and he got that in
spades from day one. I tried googling "hate Rush Limbaugh" and got
thousands of hits. For example:
"El Rushbo is a disgrace to
the media, journalists, broadcasters, and the HUMAN RACE. Period."
Much of it quickly degenerates
into spluttering profanity. Often, it completely backfires, most notably
when Harry Reid and 41 of his fellow Democratic senators signed a letter
urging Rush's bosses to reprimand him for a "phony soldier" comment
Limbaugh made on-air. That letter was put up for bids on e-Bay and raised
2.1 million dollars. Rush matched the money, which sent 4.2 million
dollars to the kids of military personnel and law enforcement officers
killed in the line of duty.
Rush Limbaugh is certainly not
above legitimate criticism. His
well-documented personal life isn't perfect. When he first attained
prominence he was notoriously thin-skinned, although I think the calluses
and scar tissue have grown over the years.
But that's serious nitpicking. If that
talent isn't on loan, Rush must at least have a lease arrangement with
God.
Jim Bohannon is a host with Westwood One Radio whose "Jim Bohannon
Show" and "America in the Morning" are heard on over 500 radio stations
nationwide. He's a member of the Radio Hall of Fame.
Back To Top
|
|
Excerpts from tributes to Rush
Limbaugh by prominent conservatives
Karl Rove...His
greatest accomplishment was to completely remake American politics by
offering an alternative to the three major networks, CNN, the
New York Times and the Washington Post. Here was a man of
conservative principles rocking the airwaves with irreverent, honest, and
unapologetic monologues, thumbing his nose at the formality of the
networks, and, in a funny and memorable way, taking the mainstream media
to task for the liberal bias that clouded their reporting.
He’s an original thinker, a
reader and a voracious consumer of information who draws on unchanging
principle to apply those facts to the world he sees.
But more important than Rush’s
voice is how he encourages his listeners to advocate their views and
values with a similar enthusiasm. If Rush engages on an issue, it gives
others courage to engage.
Mr. Rove, formerly the
senior adviser to President George W. Bush, is an analyst for Fox News and
a columnist for the Wall Street Journal and Newsweek.
Mark Levin...When I was a teenager, my dad
used to say that the media in this country are so biased and so liberal
that we conservatives needed to figure out a way to buy a big newspaper or
television network so our views could have a voice. That was 35-40 years
ago. Today, we have Rush Limbaugh. He is our voice. He is the
counter-weight to the liberal media complex.
Rush didn't have to buy a
newspaper or television network to be heard. By the force of his
brilliance and talent, he took the dying AM radio band and turned it into
the most consequential and thriving media forum in the nation. Everyday at
noon eastern time, millions and millions of Americans tune into the Rush
Limbaugh Show to listen to Rush deconstruct the day's events, skewer the
liberal mind-set, and educate about America's greatness.
There is also the private Rush
Limbaugh. Despite his enormous fame and busy schedule, Rush always has
time to listen, give the best advice he can to those who solicit it, and
lend a helping hand when needed. He is extraordinarily generous to many
charities, including those which support our troops, law enforcement, and
battle cancer.
His example gives us the
courage to stand up for our principles and face down the vitriol of too
many of our adversaries. And that’s what a leader does -- a conservative
leader and a leader in the radio industry.
Mr. Levin
is author of the New York Times bestseller, "Men in Black: How the Supreme
Court is Destroying America."
David Limbaugh...He
gave traditional Americans their voice back, legitimizing and validating
their heartfelt convictions and values. But he didn’t just defend
conservative principles. He boldly, aggressively and unapologetically
attacked the sacrosanct tenets and assumptions of liberalism and skewered
its abundant hypocrisy on public airways that had heretofore been theirs
alone. He did it with confidence, flare, intelligence, and humor, directly
at their expense. And they permanently hate him for it, with a white hot,
bitter intensity.
David
Limbaugh is an attorney, syndicated columnist, and Rush Limbaugh's
brother.
Ann Coulter...But the
moment Rush became a huge success, liberals said he was just in it for the
money!
Yes, what surer path to fame and fortune than announcing that you are a
conservative and taking on the entire mainstream media while being
repeatedly fired?
By being the first and the
most successful public conservative, Rush made it leagues easier for those
of us who followed him. Among other things, he flushed out liberals and
forced them to deploy all their idiotic talking points against him. By
now, we’ve heard the same denunciations so often, we can lip-sync liberal
attacks on us.
Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and
author of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors," "Slander," ""How to Talk to a
Liberal (If You Must)," "Godless," and most recently, "If Democrats Had
Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans."
Back To Top
|